Jump to content
  • The planned restructuring of the DB Group presents opportunities for competition in the rail sector. To this end, the new infrastructure division, InfraGo, should be established as an economically and organisationally independent entity.
  • Improved infrastructure quality is a necessary prerequisite for stimulating competition and enhancing the attractiveness of rail travel. The Monopolies Commission therefore recommends a new, quality-oriented charging regime.
  • Innovative digital ticketing service providers can also contribute to quality, provided they are granted access to all competition-relevant real-time and forecast data relating to the infrastructure. InfraGo would have to make this data available to all competitors on an equal footing. 

In its 9th sector report on the railway sector, published today and entitled “Time to GO: Finally, competition that delivers on quality!”, the Monopoly Commission sets out recommendations for strengthening competition in the railway market. “It is high time for ambitious reforms,” said the Chair of the Monopolies Commission, Prof. Dr Jürgen Kühling. This is evident not least from the serious quality shortcomings across the entire infrastructure and the numerous delays and train cancellations. The planned establishment of a public-interest infrastructure company could be a sensible component of a comprehensive reform package. 

Approaching the restructuring of the DB Group from a competition perspective. The Federal Government is currently seeking to restructure the DB Group. The infrastructure units DB Netz and DB Station & Service are to be merged into a new, public-interest-oriented infrastructure division (InfraGo). However, the process must not stop at a mere merger. Rather, care must be taken to ensure that InfraGo is structured in a competitive manner. In this regard, the Monopolies Commission recommends a high degree of economic and organisational independence from the other companies within the DB Group. To this end, the independence of the Executive Board and Supervisory Board of the new company from the transport companies of the DB Group should be ensured. Furthermore, the after-tax results of the companies within the DB Group should be presented more transparently in the annual reports in order to counteract cross-subsidisation that is detrimental to competition. 

An infrastructure company dedicated to the public good must be equally committed to all users of the infrastructure.

Jürgen Kühling, Vorsitzender der Monopolkommission

Reorienting quality regulation. Germany’s rail infrastructure is in a poor state of repair. This is evident, amongst other things, from the high number of ageing tracks and points, and the many railway bridges in need of refurbishment. The result is numerous delays and train cancellations, to the detriment of passengers and shippers. As the current regulatory framework fails to address this issue, a reorientation of railway regulation is urgently needed. “Regulation must provide stronger incentives for the infrastructure operator to invest sustainably in the quality of the infrastructure,” said the Chair of the Monopolies Commission. To this end, the Monopolies Commission recommends that quality assurance be enshrined in future within the framework of charge regulation. In this context, the train path charges that the infrastructure manager can levy on railway undertakings should be linked to the achievement of specific quality targets – such as punctuality or network size. This creates genuine incentives for the infrastructure operator to ensure better quality in the rail sector. Furthermore, all other control mechanisms must be reviewed to ensure they are quality-oriented. In this regard, the Monopolkommission welcomes the fact that funding is finally to be made available for existing infrastructure from the resources of the Performance and Financing Agreement, which until now has only subsidised new investments. The Monopolies Commission has been calling for such an extension for some time. It will ensure that the railway infrastructure is no longer run ‘into the ground’. Furthermore, it is strongly recommended that the quality targets set by the regulator in this context be linked to the remuneration of DB’s management. To achieve this, a structural cultural shift within the DB Group’s leadership is absolutely essential. The leadership must feel a much stronger commitment to all infrastructure customers than has been the case to date. 

Enabling competition in sales. A further prerequisite for competition on the railways is competition in sales. Only then can the DB Group’s competitors be more readily noticed and booked by passengers. Passengers can benefit directly from this through lower ticket prices. This is demonstrated by experience in other countries, such as Spain. In the German market, however, independent sales service providers find it difficult to gain a foothold. This is primarily because the DB Group withholds infrastructure data – particularly regarding expected arrival and departure times – from competing sales companies in order to favour its own sales operations.

If there is a genuine commitment to the common good, such practices that hinder competitors should be discontinued in future.

Jürgen Kühling, Vorsitzender der Monopolkommission

Further information for editorial teams

Cookies