- The planned restructuring of the DB Group presents opportunities for competition in the rail sector. To this end, the new infrastructure division, InfraGo, should be established as an economically and organisationally independent entity.
- Improved infrastructure quality is a necessary prerequisite for stimulating competition and enhancing the attractiveness of rail travel. The Monopolies Commission therefore recommends a new, quality-oriented charging regime.
- Innovative digital ticketing service providers can also contribute to quality, provided they are granted access to all competition-relevant real-time and forecast data relating to the infrastructure. InfraGo would have to make this data available to all competitors on an equal footing.
In its 9th sector report on the railway sector, published today and entitled “Time to GO: Finally, competition that delivers on quality!”, the Monopoly Commission sets out recommendations for strengthening competition in the railway market. “It is high time for ambitious reforms,” said the Chair of the Monopolies Commission, Prof. Dr Jürgen Kühling. This is evident not least from the serious quality shortcomings across the entire infrastructure and the numerous delays and train cancellations. The planned establishment of a public-interest infrastructure company could be a sensible component of a comprehensive reform package.
Approaching the restructuring of the DB Group from a competition perspective. The Federal Government is currently seeking to restructure the DB Group. The infrastructure units DB Netz and DB Station & Service are to be merged into a new, public-interest-oriented infrastructure division (InfraGo). However, the process must not stop at a mere merger. Rather, care must be taken to ensure that InfraGo is structured in a competitive manner. In this regard, the Monopolies Commission recommends a high degree of economic and organisational independence from the other companies within the DB Group. To this end, the independence of the Executive Board and Supervisory Board of the new company from the transport companies of the DB Group should be ensured. Furthermore, the after-tax results of the companies within the DB Group should be presented more transparently in the annual reports in order to counteract cross-subsidisation that is detrimental to competition.

